Make Meadows, Not Lawns

“The Heart of the Ecosystem: Taking Responsibility for the Extinction of Bees”

By Rosamund Portus

*Featured image: A roundabout in Mössingen, the “City of Flowers.” Photo: UnreifeKirsche [CC BY-SA 3.0], from Wikimedia Commons.

When we think of extinction, we tend to think of a few iconic species, such as the woolly mammoth or the dodo. Although none of us today has ever laid eyes on one—at least not a living specimen— we still mourn their loss. Yet, there are many creatures whose extinction we do not mourn, or just never really noticed. There was little outcry, for instance, when the Levuana Moth went extinct. And very few people are campaigning to save endangered dragonflies. However, most people certainly seem to know that bees are in danger of extinction; it has been splashed across headlines around the world, reiterated in hundreds of articles, and been the topic of many a social media campaign. In Ball and Hayne’s words, “we have been losing sleep over bees.” What is it about them that has prompted this profound response?

Photo by Jonah Alfred Hebron.

Maurice Maeterlinck famously wrote of honeybees that since the beginning of humankind, this “strange little creature, that lived in a society under complicated laws and executed prodigious labours in the darkness, attracted the notice of men.” Indeed, bees have long had a somewhat magical influence upon humans, dancing upon their imaginations and inspiring creations in literature, music, and architecture—even route-planning algorithms.  Furthermore, bees sustain human life as we know it. Read almost any narrative or text on bees and you will inevitably be told of the vital role that bee pollination plays in agriculture. It is no wonder that their plight has become a topic of so much interest and concern. Nowadays, to talk of bees is also to talk of extinction or crisis. It should be all the more troubling to us that human endeavor is predominantly responsible for this crisis. The loss of habitats, the use of chemicals on crops, the spread of diseases, and climate change are just a few examples of the threats to bees that humans must be held accountable for. If bees and other species are to flourish in this damaged world, we seriously and urgently need to evaluate our behaviors. Luckily, it’s not all bad news.

The decline of bee populations has triggered an unprecedented amount of positive and forceful activism. Whilst bees still face extensive threats, and we still have a long way to go in addressing their decline, their potential extinction has been recognized and challenged in a way that the endangerment of many other insects and animals has not. In fact, the plight of the honeybee has gained such traction that it has placed a spotlight on declining insect numbers in general. However, there is a lack of information, or indeed instruction, about how people might tangibly engage with the decline of bee populations. It would not be naïve to assume that we cannot have a direct impact upon bee populations unless we take significant action, such as becoming a beekeeper (which, as a side note, does not even necessarily help the decline of bees). I believe that perhaps the most significant and impactful way that people can help address this decline is really quite a simple one: by planting more flowers. But I do not mean just having a few more plants dotted about. I mean by turning our lawns into meadows, by filling our roundabouts with wildflowers, by replacing our walls with shrubs and hedges, and by filling our parks with trees and flower beds. Although our parks and lawns might look green and healthy, if they are not filled with the plants and flowers needed to sustain the Earth’s biodiversity they are, fundamentally, barren. Put simply, we need to bring wildflowers into our homes, gardens, and living environments. To borrow a phrase from the renowned entomologist Dennis vanEngelsdorp, we must begin to “make meadows, not lawns.”

Monarch nectaring on milkweed at Seedskadee NWR. Photo: Tom Koerner, USFWS.

Motivating people to essentially rewild their home environments will not only be beneficial for bees. Enriching everyday places will help many of the other, arguably less obviously appealing, insects to thrive once again. Numerous species are threatened with extinction and, like bees, one of the key reasons for their increased loss is the destruction of habitats. Even the smallest of wildflower patches could become host to a rich variety of insect life, such as butterflies, beetles, dragonflies, and grasshoppers. The St. Louis butterfly project Milkweed for Monarchs, which launched on Earth Day in 2014, has been particularly successful in this regard. It has also helped connect people with urban nature. At its start, this rewilding initiative aimed to establish 50 community gardens, most of which were located at fire stations and in parks throughout the city. By 2015, a further 50 gardens were created in urban schools. Today, a large proportion of monarch gardens exist in people’s home gardens, providing an oasis for insects and butterflies.

It is not only insects that would benefit, however. Humans would benefit as well. Although I am cautious about relying on anthropocentric reasons for addressing insect extinction, it is undeniable that if we can show people the obvious benefits to themselves, it is more likely to motivate widespread action. The Milkweed project, for instance, inspired the community to exceed the original goal of planting 250 gardens. There is abundant research that shows how humans, which are themselves natural entities, benefit emotionally and psychologically from being surrounded with natural spaces and habitats. E. O. Wilson defined this relationship as “biophilia,” the innate and valuable bond between humans and other natural life forms. In recent years, as the human world has become increasingly modernized, there is concern that we have lost this vital connection with the natural world. Whilst I do not necessarily agree with this contention, largely because it relies too heavily on the misleading premise that humans could ever be separate from nature, I do believe that we will certainly benefit from that connection if we begin to invite plants and flowers back into our lives.

Although this blog is dedicated to addressing the loss of insect populations, it is important to recognize the wider positive impacts that addressing insect extinction would have. For instance, planting flowers will not only increase biodiversity or enrich human experiences; it can also help address issues such as air pollution, and even flooding.

Not everyone has a lawn, or even outdoor space. Not everyone is an architect or a town planner. But everyone has a voice… and most of us have an empty windowsill. Planting flowers does not need to be inaccessible or exclusive. The benefits of rewilding our everyday spaces in this way are endless. Flexing our green thumb would help address the decline of insects, such as bees, whilst also significantly enhancing human and more-than-human lives. I do not offer this as a “silver bullet” solution, but rather as one of the many ways in which we can begin to address the mass extinction of insects. In doing so, we can work towards achieving the fundamental cultural shift needed to move forward in an age defined by environmental instability.

22 Comments on “Make Meadows, Not Lawns

  1. It’s most certainly time for a new garden ethic — every landscape matters in a time of mass extinction and climate change. Love that last paragraph above.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Even if people elect to have a xeriscape, flowering plants can be I included always!


  3. Beautifully said and done. Make meadows throughout your neighborhoods!


  4. Lawns are deserts for bees, butterflies, box turtles, and so many other living beings. Most people don’t even enjoy mowing–it can be hot, uncomfortable labor. The chemicals used on “bad” insects also kill beneficial insects. Birds that eat chemically poisoned insects or plants become sick or die. Are those reasons also enough for us to re-evaluate our behavior and plant meadows? I think so.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I’ve not had a lawn for over 20 years, in favor of flowers, fruit trees, and native species. I love it. However, it has been an ongoing battle with the unenlightened city workers who consider it undesirable. Judging from the number of people that stop by my garden to praise this approach, it certainly has a reasonably large fan club. We need to educate city governments to appreciate and allow non-lawn favoring citizens.


  6. My community is transforming 33 acres of mowed former golf course to meadows and woods. Besides being a “green desert” (a phrase I also coined quite a while back) mowing generates tremendous amounts of pollution including greenhouse gases. Years from now, our little project will reduce, remove and sequester carbon equivalent to nearly 1 million miles of driving today’s cars. But yes, we have had quite a battle with our neighbors and the county.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. @Carol In the area I live, many (most?) hire someone else to do their yardwork. So they’ve further lost the connection with being out in it and, often, trying to appeal to the side of less mowing and other tasks that go with maintaining turf are lost on them.


  8. Meadows alone cannot replace a thoughtful mix of state natives in a public landscape as shown. In May, wildflower and native grass meadows are lovely. In July, the wildflowers in a ‘meadows’ are brown and dry and I must say, scraggly.

    Instead, a mix of evergreen and deciduous natives can be planted to show gardeners what could be done in their own gardens. Wildflowers could certainly be part of this planting, but not exclusively so.


  9. Great idea looking forward to my back garden this year done a patch last year of wild flowers and am going to not cut it all and plant all the back with wild flowers

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Let’s do this for the creatures who share this planet with us. Let’s all focus on something separate from ourselves for it’s benefit. Humans have that ability, that responsibility, not only how it benefits or amuses the individual but because it exists.


  11. What are good lawn replacement plants for over a septic drain field?


  12. That’s my Instagram handle where I document our efforts to reclaim our 13.4 acres as an oxygen farm. But it’s the walnut trees that we hope will allow us to formalize it as farmland, because no one will pay us $1000 a year for the oxygen. We didn’t accomplish a lot last year, but think we see where we went wrong. Greatest thrill was the dragonflies.


  13. Switching from a grass covered lawn to a meadow or wild flowers is a great idea and something I would like to consider. However, how does one get rid of all the grass? What services are necessary to get the grass pulled up? If you have a big lawn and big backyard as I do, I’m assuming the expense would be quite Hefty. Any advice on how to go about this? Thanks, DM in Rochester New York


  14. Pingback: Extinguishing the Alphabet … of Bens and Bugs | Full Frontal Faith

  15. Is there a list somewhere of plants that I should plant for my meadow?


  16. You actually don’t need to pull out all of the grass. For smaller patches this may be practical though. One thing to consider is doing sections at a time. You can cover up sections with newspaper and soil, or landscape barrier for a few months. This will usually kill off most of what is underneath. You could also rent a tiller or have someone come in to till the soil. While this won’t actually remove the grass, once tilled under and then layered with some good growing soil/compost, it’s very easy to control regrowth. A (very) last resort if you want to do the whole thing is to use an herbicide. This is typically only recommended for the largest of areas to be recultivated though.


  17. How does someone without a green thumb turn their lawn into a meadow? I’m in if I can figure it out.


  18. Pingback: Silent Spring: have we learned anything? | All things environmental

  19. The key difference between a natural meadow or a prairie and a lawn is that the former are made up of native grasses and plants, whereas lawns are made up of grasses that are there for their durability and may not be (and in many cases are not) native to the area.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: